This is Part II in a series. Although it isn’t essential to read Part I first, you may find it helpful.
Consider the history of sin entering the cosmos. In Genesis 3 we have both the history of events, and the Gospel reveal. God initiated contact with the now rebellious, fallen, and sinful man. God knew Adam had sinned. God wasn’t just wandering through the garden and couldn’t find the man He had created. God purposefully entered the garden and called out to Adam. The question God asked wasn’t because God needed to fill in missing knowledge. It was in part to reveal to the man what man no longer had. The man came out of hiding and replied:
And [Adam] said, “I heard the sound of you in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked, and I hid myself.” Genesis 3:10
God replies to Adam with a question that, as always, contains much more than you or I can imagine it to contain. God isn’t asking a question that He doesn’t know the answer to. Just as God knew where Adam was when He asked, “Where are you?”, God’s purpose in asking the next question is to bring the man into understanding. To cause man to know the consequences of his actions. So that he could know his thinking had changed, and to know why he was now thinking differently.
Adam was naked before he sinned. He didn’t become more naked after he sinned. Adam was aware he was not wearing any physical clothing before he sinned. He didn’t just suddenly become aware of some extra sinfulness present in being without clothes. The sin didn’t cause Adam to suddenly realize his body needed to be covered. Here’s what transpired:
[God] said, “Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten of the tree of which I commanded you not to eat?” Genesis 3:11
God is not just acting out the role of the offended rule enforcer. He’s not gleefully about to hand out punishment for no other reason than, you know, “Adam broke the rules and those who break rules have to be cast out.” Adam wasn’t some new-born baby-like intellect that needed to be taught right-and-wrong like all children. Adam was created with intelligence and rationality. God had previously instructed Adam in right and wrong. He was fully aware that rebellion against God had consequences. Ironically, those of us who are now six thousand years later in experience and knowledge often deny that rebellion has consequences. And that’s the point.
If you ask six Christians followed by a seventh how we should minister to the culture you will get seven times seventy opinions. The culturally-conscious mega-church pastor is convinced that essential and appropriate contextualization means starting Easter Sunday service with “Highway to Hell”. Across town, his covenant-theology brother is confessing the necessity of detailed exegesis even in the absence of any cultural application. They are both considered fools by the “Science Guy”. The culture presses on without being affected.
Since we, as Christians, have access to not just good ideas, but truth that is life changing, why is our ministry increasingly rejected by the world? It is because, as Dr. Al Mohler, President of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and one of Christianity’s foremost cultural appraisers notes, Christians are in an epistemological crisis.
To our shame, most Christians don’t know what epistemology means. Our loss of knowledge is strolling along blissfully hand-in-hand with our lack of understanding as to why the culture, and at times even our churches, are unaffected by the Gospel.
Epistemology – not a word most Christians use every day. Ironically, not even a word most Christians have ever used. Hence, part of the crisis. Epistemology is the study of knowledge and of knowing. It is an attempt to answer the question of “How do we know truth and what is true?” It is the mental drawer in which humans place our understanding of how belief occurs and the rationality for defending those beliefs as true. It is where we keep the theory by which we explain why it is OK to believe the Genesis account of creation is historically and scientifically accurate. That same place that explains why it is rational to confess that Jesus was born of a virgin and rose from the dead. It is how we can defend the necessity and value to the culture of marriage defined by a husband (male) and wife (female) in a life-long covenant.
The Christian’s epistemological crisis is we do not know why people think the way they think, and why we must think differently. We observe the culture rejecting what seems to be obvious truth, even what some would call self-evident truth, and don’t know why or how to change the culture. We emphasized cultural conscious and cultural sensitivity in our attempt to minister to the culture, and found the culture simply rejected our attempts at an even greater level.
The culture — yep, the one that is in rebellion against God – that one – has claimed the high ground of intellectual influence. And there are a lot of Christians who believe that’s OK.
It is not.
Of all the criteria we would identify that defines a Christian, thinking should be high on that list. We are renewed, changed. The sanctifying work of the Holy Spirit is effective and ongoing at changing us. What part of “us”? What part of me the individual is being renewed by salvation? My soul? Yes. My body? Not yet, but will be. My mind? The way I think? My skills at reasoning and coming to the truth? Yes! With the new knowledge that God is Sovereign, purposeful, capable, and self-revealing, I can now submit my reasoning to the revealed Truth He has given.
Christians should be on the high ground of intellect, leading the culture in developing and applying knowledge across the disciplines. For the sake of those who will be regenerated by the Gospel, and for those who will still reject the Gospel, but live in this world, we should be seeing a transformation of the culture that comes from the common grace of the Gospel.